Your eClinicalWorks billing reports look fine. The A/R keeps aging anyway, and the denial queue refills faster than anyone can clear it.
Most denials trace back to a flaw in the claim before it leaves your building: a demographic mismatch, a coverage gap, or documentation the payer wanted and did not find. Working the denial recovers that one claim, and the next claim carrying the same flaw goes out behind it.
HRG runs eCW billing from inside your own eCW instance, so the flaw gets caught at the front end, where your staff can watch it happen. The documented range is a 15 to 30 percent reduction in denials, from a 100 percent U.S.-based team with over 26 years in medical billing.
HRG runs claims, denials, and A/R inside your eCW. Coding stays with your coders or coding vendor, and HRG provides coding consultation as needed.
Each of those runs in the system your staff already opens every morning.
Working inside your instance means claim submissions, denials, and payments are visible to your staff as they happen, not summarized afterward. Your team never logs into a separate dashboard and never waits on a monthly PDF, because the record worth seeing is the one already in your eCW. HRG also works in your payer portals, so status checks happen where the payer answers.
Reporting is the live view inside eCW and your payer portals. Every week and every month, the billers on your account review your A/R, which is where an aging balance or a growing denial category gets named and assigned.
A denial rate gets set at the front end. Registration data, coverage, and documentation decide whether a claim clears the payer's edits, so recovering denied claims one at a time never moves the rate, and the same flaw keeps feeding the queue. Lowering the rate means correcting the cause upstream, which is why HRG scrubs claims inside eCW before they go out. That front-end work sits behind a 98 percent first-pass claim acceptance track record, confirmed by the CFO.
Cash speed depends on how soon a claim goes out and how soon someone touches it when it stalls. HRG targets clean submission within 48 hours of service and works aging balances every week, and its documented range is a 15 to 25 day reduction in A/R days. All of it happens inside the eCW your staff already knows.
Handing billing to HRG moves the daily work of claims, denials, and A/R follow-up off your staff and onto a team working in the same eCW screens they use. When a biller gives notice mid-cycle, HRG can step in inside the same instance, with same-day onboarding where scope and access permit. Nothing about the arrangement asks your staff to learn another system.
Timely filing misses, authorization gaps, and thin medical necessity documentation share a trait: each gets decided before or at the moment of service. Appeals recover some of them, but the dependable fix sits upstream. Prior authorization stays with your practice and HRG advises on workflow, so that gap closes at your front desk instead of in the denial queue.
Together, those three stop a denial category from becoming a standing line in your A/R report.
HRG configures clearinghouse connections and encounter forms inside your existing eCW and installs no new software. Your staff keeps its current workflows and access.
Practices on eCW can also buy managed RCM from eClinicalWorks itself, where the platform's team handles billing for you. An independent partner like HRG works inside your existing eCW instead. The difference comes down to accountability and how you see the work.
| eClinicalWorks managed RCM | eClinicalWorks billing with HRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Who does the work | The platform's internal team | A dedicated U.S.-based team working inside your own eCW |
| How you see it | Visibility dashboards and periodic statements | Live inside your eCW and payer portals, with no separate dashboards or PDF reports |
Ask any managed RCM provider, eCW's included, for three things in writing: who does the work, how often the billers review your A/R, and how you leave. HRG also handles credentialing and contracting, so a new provider's enrollment and the claims that follow sit with one team.
HRG is EHR-agnostic and works inside whatever system a practice already runs. The same arrangement applies on NextGen and ModMed, and it runs for cardiology practices on eCW and podiatry practices on eCW.
A Kansas podiatry practice found out during an EMR migration that its prior vendor's process could not carry the switch. Claims went out late or to the wrong payers, and A/R climbed. HRG had the new billing process operational within 30 days, brought A/R below its pre-migration level, and lifted cash flow 20 percent, as the billing turnaround case study shows. In Kentucky, a pain management clinic that left a billing company not filing claims on time recorded a 40 percent improvement in collections and a 35 percent drop in denials, detailed in the A/R case study. Both were billing turnarounds run inside the practice's own EMR.
It is the claim, denial, and A/R work run inside your eCW instance, and it needs a specialist because a front-end error only shows up weeks later as a denial. A team that sees the claim, the denial, and the follow-up in one system can trace one to the other.
HRG's U.S.-based billers work directly inside your existing eCW and payer portals, managing claim submission, denial prevention and appeals, and A/R follow-up. No outside software or separate dashboards get added, and your staff sees every action.
HRG works inside it. Your workflows, staff access, and reporting tools stay in place, and HRG manages the billing functions that drive your revenue.
Yes, and each line stands alone or together. Credentialing runs hourly on a one-page, month-to-month contract, while billing runs on a longer-term agreement scoped to your practice during onboarding. Practices that use both get one team across enrollment and claims.
HRG scopes billing terms to your practice during onboarding, and you review every invoice before HRG charges it. Exact rates are not posted, so the billing consult is where scope and terms get set.
Submission speed and denial response move first, since HRG targets clean submission within 48 hours of service and responds to denials in 24 to 48 hours. Aged A/R takes longer, and the documented range is a 15 to 25 day reduction in A/R days. HRG does not promise a timeline for your numbers, because they depend on what your current A/R holds.
U.S.-based billers assigned to your account, working inside your eCW. There are no offshore handoffs, and you can reach the people doing the work directly.
If your A/R is aging and your denial queue keeps refilling, schedule a billing consultation with Andy Garcia or call 913-937-2995. No pitch and no pressure.
Book an eCW Billing Consult or call 913-937-2995